Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Are Smart People Getting Smarter?

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/08/are-smart-people-getting-smarter/
What’s puzzling about this increase in general intelligence is that it appears where we’d least expect it. While one might assume that IQ scores could increase over time in terms of crystallized intelligence — the part of the test that measures particular kinds of knowledge, such as being able to count or vocabulary words — it’s actually increased on measures of fluid intelligence, which is the ability to solve abstract problems. This has led some psychologists, such as Ian Dreary, to conclude that “largedifferences in scores [between generations] are demonstrated in just those situations where similaritywould be expected.” Flynn, meanwhile, marveled at the magical constancy of the effect: “It’s as if some unseen hand is propelling scores upward,” he wrote.

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Think like an innovator

http://blogs.hbr.org/video/2011/07/think-like-an-innovator.html


Jeff Dyer, professor at Brigham Young University's Marriott School of Management and coauthor ofThe Innovator's DNA, outlines the four ways leaders come up with their great ideas.





Five Skills of Distruptive Innovator:


1-encourage questions
2-create time to observe
3-sponsor networking opportunities
4-run experiments
5-Associate




leadership and innovation

http://smartblogs.com/leadership/2011/07/07/dow-chemicals-carol-williams-on-leadership-and-innovation/


disciplined approach continues in applying the often-vague concept of leadership. Williams employs the “three Vs”:
  • Vision – Inspiring people to look enthusiastically toward the future that you describe.
  • Visible – Of your strategy, she says, “Communicate it in person.” This also involves making your vision visible to everyone, but also “tangible.”
  • Value – What does the employee’s contribution mean to bringing about the vision, but also, what does it mean for them?

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

How to Make a Big Company Innovative


By Dave Logan | March 22, 2011
One of the dumber statements around came to me this week in an email from a major tech company. The employer wanted to know whether I thought a former student could “work like an entrepreneur within a large company.”
A lot of the tech giants, like Google and Microsoft, are trying to get back to the innovation that they once had by trying to shed layers and hire more entrepreneurial people.  It won’t work.
Big companies are capable of things small companies can’t do, and the reverse is also true.  As companies age, like trees, they add layers of decisions, history, policies, procedures, and rules.  Invariably, functions form, they turn to divisions, and eventually into a matrix structure.  My USC colleague Larry Greiner wrote thedefinitive article on this progression.
There are things managers can do to make the organization more nimble, but one thing that doesn’t work is to declare that we’re going to be entrepreneurial.  Might as well declare that the sun should come out a midnight.
However, there is a step that managers can take to get back some of that entrepreneurial mojo.  It’s to create a separate unit, a skunk works.  If you follow all of the steps below, it works well.
  1. Form the separate unit in a different geographical region-ideally, far away from the company headquarters.
  2. Although the unit will be part of the same company, it needs to look and feel completely different.  Specifically, the company rules, procedures, hierarchy, values, and norms shouldn’t apply in this innovative group.  It needs its own fingerprint and leadership style.
  3. The unit should be run by an “orchestrator,” a person with R&D credibility who can create a culture based on shared values, and “triadic relationships.”  Think Robert Oppenheimer in the Manhattan Project.
  4. The unit needs to be connected to the mothership by a “sponsor,” a high-ranking executive at the company headquarters who can talk intelligently about the innovative efforts underway, and the value they have to the company.
There are ways of kick starting the skunk works to get it to more innovative faster.  Here are some:
  1. Create an enemy.  The more the group can feel they are in a race with another group, and that they’re starting off behind, the better.  Bill Gates did this in his famous “Internet Tidal Wave memo” of 1995, arguing that “a new competitor ‘born’ on the Internet” was putting Gates’ company in serious danger.
  2. Don’t give them every resource.  Innovation results from need and scarcity.
  3. Encourage “garage tours,” which are informal events when members of the skunk works reveal their efforts, including their failures.  Steven Johnson has correctly noted that many good ideas come from “spare parts.”  The more people are aware of the resources that they can use, the more innovative they will be.
Ever been told to act like an entrepreneur within a company smothering its employees in red tape?  How did that work out?
Follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Are Visionaries Born or Created?


By Lane Wallace

The announcement by Steve Jobs, last week, that he was taking another medical leave caused considerable alarm among Apple's investors and customers alike. Jobs has an unusually influential role in new product development at Apple. So his absence raises the question of whether Apple can continue to have successes like the iPod, iPhone, and iPad without the day-to-day involvement of its visionary leader. 

A temporary leave by the CEO of most companies wouldn't raise as much concern. But Apple's products are consistently out on the risky, scary, leading-edge, and Jobs has developed an almost mystical reputation for hitting that edge dead-on. As a professor at MIT's Sloan School of Management put it last week, "Jobs has this extraordinary ability to see into the future and instinctively see what people want." 

The aura surrounding Jobs is not without basis. Few would argue that Jobs has a knack for figuring out, without a lot of analytical supporting data, what consumers want before consumers themselves even know that they want it. But is that knack--whether you call it instinct or vision--an inborn piece of magic that nobody else could replicate? Or is it something far more attainable by the rest of us than the mythology surrounding Steve Jobs might suggest? 

For the past year, I've been researching a book that's forced me to take a closer look at that question. The book is about passion--where it comes from, where it can take us, and why it matters. And the origins of passion, I've concluded, are directly linked to this idea of "vision." For passion to take hold, we first have to have a vision of an alternate future that ignites a fire within us: a vision of a wrong righted, a community developed, a great new product made and sold, a goal achieved, or just a new relationship full of happiness and bliss. Not every vision leads to a passionate pursuit of it, of course. But in all cases where people do pursue something with passion, it's because there was a vision, first, that sparked an unquenchable flame and desire to make that vision real. 

Given that link, and given that many of us would like to find something to pursue with the passion Steve Jobs has for revolutionary personal computer technology, the question of where vision comes from becomes important. And most of the entrepreneurs, adventurers, and passionate pursuers of social change that I've interviewed so far agree that vision is not just a capricious gift of the gods; the entrepreneur's equivalent of the 98-mph fastball arm. It's also a product of environment, and the kind of thinking that different environments stimulate. 

Clearly, people like Steve Jobs have a certain amount of natural talent for looking at a spatter-pattern of dots on a wall and seeing something in them that few others see. The same could be said of superstar athletes like Michael Jordan, whose physical abilities were aided by his ability to "see" a different path to the basket than his competitors. 

So it's fair to say that superstars possess some inborn talent. As a friend of mine who's coached many sports says, "you can't coach height or speed." You can, however, coach a flexible mindset that makes creative vision come more easily to a person. How do you do that? A number of ways. Here are just a few:

K.R. Sridhar, the CEO of the innovative energy start-up company Bloom Energy, attributes his inventor's vision to four elements in his childhood: 

1) exposure to many cultures, which instilled in him a belief that just because something was done a particular way didn't mean there weren't 16 other valid ways it could be done

2) support and enthusiasm for trying new things. To imagine something that doesn't yet exist and have the confidence to pursue or invest resources in that vision, a person has to believe a) that exploration and experimentation are good things and b) that isn't just one right answer. (So kids raised in regimented households tend to have a harder time coming up with highly creative visions that challenge accepted ways of doing things.)  

3) support for failure. To imagine, share, and pursue a creative vision, a person also has to be brave enough to tolerate failure. Steve Jobs has that confidence; most people and companies do not. Hence the popularity of market research and data analysis. Companies want to ensure success, and they have an odd (and, innovation consultants say, misplaced) faith in hard numbers to do that. But visionary success is never assured. It's a risk, and requires being comfortable with risk and failure in the pursuit of the extraordinary. 

4) a belief that finding innovative ways to make the world better is important. A mind in search of better ideas, even if they sound radical, is more likely to stumble across one. 

To those elements, Tim Brown, CEO and president of the innovation consulting company IDEO, would add "being surrounded by people who have a flexible mindset." We become what we are around -- which might help explain why geographically centralized places like Silicon Valley become such furnaces of innovation. 

That's not an exhaustive list. But the point is ... visionary ability is not just something we are or aren't born with. It can be taught--or at least, nurtured, enhanced, and encouraged to grow. And while we may not all develop Steve Jobs' level of visionary talent, we can all get a lot better at it. 

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Why college students don't understand plagiarism


Is our "copy & paste" Internet culture blurring the definition of cheating — or just making it a lot easier?

College students know that copying from a book is wrong - but they think the same rules don't apply on the Internet
College students know that copying from a book is wrong - but they think the same rules don't apply on the Internet Photo: Corbis SEE ALL 10 PHOTOS
Best Opinion:  Mother Jones, Shiny Shiny, Volokh
Plagiarism doesn't matter like it used to — at least not to college students. According to The New York Times, students raised during the Internet age have developed an extremely lax attitude towards stealing others' work. Many do it and consider it a non-issue, failing to grasp the difference between an unacceptable "copy & paste" and a properly cited passage. Is our digital free-for-all culture triggering an ethical breakdown? (Watch a local report about how to curb plagiarism.)

No, it's just easier to be unethical now: Are college students "redefining authorship"? asks Kevin Drum in Mother Jones. Not at all. They're simply "lazy and don't feel like trying to craft sentences of their own" — just like "every plagiarist in history." The only difference: The Internet has made plagiarism "a hundred times easier" than searching through dusty books in the library. 
"The economics of plagiarism"

The age of "collaborative" content calls for new rules: Rather than condemn this generation for its ignorance, says Anna Leach in Shiny Shiny, "maybe it's time to redefine the rules." Content "is often collaborative" today: From YouTube to personal blogs, people are "sharing and remixing" each other's work. And much of the Internet's greatest hits — "the idea of LOLcats," for example — have come from this collective culture. "Maybe the academic world should catch up ..."
"Our copy-paste culture and why plagiarism isn't such a problem anymore"

It goes both ways: Sorry, but there's a "difference between incorporating the work of another and passing it off as one’s own," says law professor Jonathan H. Adler in The Volokh Conspiracy. Since we've failed to teach students that distinction, they'd better realize that the Internet has also simplified the process of "catching plagiarism." Watch out, students; teachers have a few tricks up their sleeves, too. 
"Plagiarism 2.0"

Friday, January 21, 2011

The 7 Habits of Highly Innovative People


7 Habits of Highly Effective People
Steve Tobak

The Corner Office

Steve Tobak


Tell the truth: how many times have you read a business or self-help book, said, “Wow, that was cool,” and then, well, nothing changed? Well, you’re not alone. That’s the whole problem with that genre; it’s always someone’s idea of what works for him or what he thinks will work for others. It really doesn’t account for the billions of variations on the theme of human intelligence.
Still, Stephen R. Covey’s got millions of fans who swear by his seminal book, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. I’m not one of them, but that’s because I’m different. In fact, most entrepreneurs I know - and I know lots of them - just don’t fit the mold of folks who can actually benefit from a cookie-cutter set of habits. Instead, they tend to carve their own paths through life … and they do it their own way.
So, with all due respect to Covey, here’s an adaptation of his seven habits that I think fits innovators and entrepreneurs (You’ll find Covey’s in parenthesis at the end of each habit):
The 7 Habits of Highly Innovative People
Habit 1: Be Passionate. Finding your passion is not only the key to happiness, but also the key to business success. As Steve Jobsonce said, “Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking. Don’t settle.” (Be Proactive)
Habit 2: Do Something. You don’t always know where it’s going to lead, but it’s always better to do something than to suffer analysis paralysis. Legendary oil-man and entrepreneur T. Boone Pickenshas a way of quickly sizing up a situation, coming up with a plan, and acting. There’s no sitting around or endless analysis and debate. It seems to have worked for him. (Begin with the End in Mind)
Habit 3: Put First Things First, Second, and Third. Covey says prioritize, but I’ll take it one step further. Whoever said, “don’t sweat the small stuff,” was right, and I’ll add, “don’t do or even think about the small stuff.” Every successful innovative person I know jumps on hot opportunities and critical issues like they’re the only things that matter on god’s green Earth. (Put First Things First)
Habit 4: Think Win. Former New York Yankees owner George Steinbrenner may have been a world-class a-hole, but he was a remarkably rich and successful world-class a-hole who let nothing stand in the way of the only thing that ever really mattered to him, winning. Bill GatesLarry Ellison - show me a successful entrepreneur and I’ll show you someone who puts winning first.(Think Win/Win)
Habit 5: Seek First to Understand, then to Innovate. The key to innovation is to first understand a big hairy problem that, to date, nobody’s been able to solve. Once you’ve got that, then, and only then, does it even begin to make sense to do something about it. Otherwise you’ll just end up with a great product nobody needs.(Seek First to Understand, then to be Understood)
Habit 6: Energize. With rare exception, successful innovators are high-energy people with a unique ability to stimulate and motivate others. That’s called leadership. Without it, you can have the most effective habits or the best ideas in the world, but nobody will ever know it, because nobody will care and nothing will actually get done.(Synergize)
Habit 7: Question the Status Quo. Andy Grove built semiconductor powerhouse Intel on several principles, two of which were “only the paranoid survive” and “constructive confrontation.” That means never rest on your laurels, continually challenge your own assumptions, and always question the status quo. That’s how Intel became a high-tech dynasty. (Sharpening the Saw)