Showing posts with label Brainstorming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brainstorming. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Why Brainstorming Sucks (And How to Fix It)



The typical business brainstorming session consists of a bunch of people thrown together in a room and exhorted to “Think outside the box!” and “Rule nothing out!” Why this remains standard procedure is a mystery, since few brainstorming exercises of this sort yield much of value, and the problems with the conventional approach are well known.
If you want to do brainstorming right, discard the widely believed myths and go with the proven approaches. For instance:
Myth: The more ideas, the better. A superior approach is to think: “The more better ideas, the better.” When brainstorming is too open to any and all ideas, and every idea is at least initially treated as equal, too many proposals are completely useless because they lie outside the organization’s capabilities or limits. McKinsey & Co. describes a process called “brainsteering” in which some pre-set parameters — ideas have to cost less than $5,000, say, or generate quick payback — help idea-generators come up with feasible proposals, rather than concepts that are so far outside the box that they’re useless.
Myth: A group of people working together can come up with better ideas than one person. Numerous studies support the opposite contention. A 2010 article in The Journal of Creative Behavior reports a typical finding: “Groups of individuals generating ideas in isolation (nominal groups) generated more ideas and more original ideas and were more likely to select original ideas during the group decision phase than interactive group brainstormers.” One way to do nominal group brainstorming is to have participants come up with ideas on their own before the group session. Alternately, give each person in the session a piece of paper on which to write down ideas, without input from others, before subjecting them to discussion.
Myth: The best ideas naturally float to the top when discussion and evaluation is open, free-ranging, and unrestricted. Wide-open brainstorming sessions have many problems, beginning with the fact that talkative, dominating people tend to drown out quieter ones, whether or not the wallflowers’ ideas are better. Get around this with round-robin brainstorming. This approach poses a question to the group, after which each member has a chance to bring up his or her suggestions without comment or interruption from the others. A scribe is assigned to write down each person’s thoughts. Only after everyone has been heard from is the floor thrown open to talk generally about each idea.
In some respects, a business is like a machine that takes ideas dumped into the top and turns them into money that comes out the bottom. To the extent that’s valid, how well your business does is a function of how good your ideas are. Discarding myths about brainstorming and doing this venerable creative process right will go far to improve the raw material you’re using to create profit.



Friday, January 21, 2011

Brainstorming and Mindmapping Remotely Isn’t Easy, But It’s Worth The Trouble


Wayne Turmel

Connected Manager

Wayne Turmel


One of the most important functions a team has is capturing information and bouncing great ideas around. Working remotely creates unique challenges because it’s not simple to get input from everyone, capture the information and share the results with the whole team in real time. It can be done, but it takes careful planning, strong facilitation skills and the right tools.
Mind-mapping, or idea-mapping as it’s sometimes known, is a very useful and underutilized tool for teams but it’s tough to do remotely. Many teams use common webmeeting tools but these are often not sufficient. According to Scott Raskin, the CEO of Mindjet, part of the problem is the way most people lead webmeetings.
“Collaborating with remote teams, as it’s usually done, doesn’t work,” he says. “Web conferences can be great to broadcast information they’re not conducive to real-time collaboration.  The problem is one person must  maintain control of the document.  Collaboration shouldn’t be a stilted and slow formal process that only occurs when you  pass the “ball” from user to another”. Additionally, too many people don’t use the interactive features that are available, relying on PowerPoint decks and limiting functions like chat and letting everyone write on the white board (assuming you have a tool that offers these tools- they don’t all do so).
“Change is hard even when the change is beneficial. We all know that it’s better to eat healthy and exercise yet we don’t always do what’s best for us, do we?”. Raskins warns managers to be prepared for the initial friction as you move from strictly linear applications to a more free-form approach. “For a team looking to use maps remotely to plan, manage information or processes, it’s important to come together (virtually or in-person) to define the basic structure of the map templates that you’ll be using. Without it, members may be tempted to reorganize the content in ways that make sense to them but may in fact disorient the other team members”.
“Facilitating information mapping sessions can become challenging when participants are brand new to the concept. New team members may find it daunting to engage maps that have been previously created without an introduction or understanding the map’s ‘rules of engagement’”. In other words, they need to know where and how to contribute ideas, notes, update status, etc. It’s also tempting to provide early access to project maps with new team members but you should be careful. These maps can be a little overwhelming since these team members haven’t participated in the map’s creation. The organization and depth of the map may be confusing without an accompanying explanation.
Here are some tips for helping your team brainstorm better whether online or in person:
  • It’s important to provide new users with a brief overview of mapping and how it works. This can be as simple as explaining how a map can be used to capture everyone’s input, then how the information should be organized to make sense  to everyone. Leveraging templates for repetitive processes like project planning will also accelerate adoption over time.
  • Like any meeting, your mindmap should have a clear purpose and outcome. You can add branches for the agenda, goals, desired outcomes and even a “parking lot”for ideas you haven’t got a place for yet.
  • That chaos is kind of the point: content comes first, organization comes second
  • The brainstorm doesn’t necessarily end when the session is over- it can (and probably should) be used as a living document. This is where software like Mindjet and others come in and actually have major advantages over the good old flipchart. You should be able to search, add to and reorganize the information and when the information is digital .
Leaders must master both the  facilitation skills to run great brainstorms as well as the technical competence to use the tools at their disposal if they’re going to leverage the brainpower on their team. It shouldn’t matter if they’re on opposite ends of the planet or meeting over doughnuts in the conference room.
Read more: