Is our "copy & paste" Internet culture blurring the definition of cheating — or just making it a lot easier?
POSTED ON AUGUST 3, 2010, AT 6:08 PM
College students know that copying from a book is wrong - but they think the same rules don't apply on the Internet Photo: Corbis SEE ALL 10 PHOTOS
Best Opinion: Mother Jones, Shiny Shiny, Volokh
Plagiarism doesn't matter like it used to — at least not to college students. According to The New York Times, students raised during the Internet age have developed an extremely lax attitude towards stealing others' work. Many do it and consider it a non-issue, failing to grasp the difference between an unacceptable "copy & paste" and a properly cited passage. Is our digital free-for-all culture triggering an ethical breakdown? (Watch a local report about how to curb plagiarism.)
No, it's just easier to be unethical now: Are college students "redefining authorship"? asks Kevin Drum in Mother Jones. Not at all. They're simply "lazy and don't feel like trying to craft sentences of their own" — just like "every plagiarist in history." The only difference: The Internet has made plagiarism "a hundred times easier" than searching through dusty books in the library.
"The economics of plagiarism"
The age of "collaborative" content calls for new rules: Rather than condemn this generation for its ignorance, says Anna Leach in Shiny Shiny, "maybe it's time to redefine the rules." Content "is often collaborative" today: From YouTube to personal blogs, people are "sharing and remixing" each other's work. And much of the Internet's greatest hits — "the idea of LOLcats," for example — have come from this collective culture. "Maybe the academic world should catch up ..."
"Our copy-paste culture and why plagiarism isn't such a problem anymore"
It goes both ways: Sorry, but there's a "difference between incorporating the work of another and passing it off as one’s own," says law professor Jonathan H. Adler in The Volokh Conspiracy. Since we've failed to teach students that distinction, they'd better realize that the Internet has also simplified the process of "catching plagiarism." Watch out, students; teachers have a few tricks up their sleeves, too.
"Plagiarism 2.0"
No, it's just easier to be unethical now: Are college students "redefining authorship"? asks Kevin Drum in Mother Jones. Not at all. They're simply "lazy and don't feel like trying to craft sentences of their own" — just like "every plagiarist in history." The only difference: The Internet has made plagiarism "a hundred times easier" than searching through dusty books in the library.
"The economics of plagiarism"
The age of "collaborative" content calls for new rules: Rather than condemn this generation for its ignorance, says Anna Leach in Shiny Shiny, "maybe it's time to redefine the rules." Content "is often collaborative" today: From YouTube to personal blogs, people are "sharing and remixing" each other's work. And much of the Internet's greatest hits — "the idea of LOLcats," for example — have come from this collective culture. "Maybe the academic world should catch up ..."
"Our copy-paste culture and why plagiarism isn't such a problem anymore"
It goes both ways: Sorry, but there's a "difference between incorporating the work of another and passing it off as one’s own," says law professor Jonathan H. Adler in The Volokh Conspiracy. Since we've failed to teach students that distinction, they'd better realize that the Internet has also simplified the process of "catching plagiarism." Watch out, students; teachers have a few tricks up their sleeves, too.
"Plagiarism 2.0"
No comments:
Post a Comment